Abstract
Can πάθος, beyond being understood as undergoing or suffering, also intrinsically contain the idea of acting? There is no doubt that its primordial movement must necessarily be regarded as a “pathic” moment; yet within it, if observed from a certain angle, the possibility of “agency” may also emerge. Such a perspective, and the consequences arising from it, may find an initial formulation in the supreme law of πάθει μάθος proclaimed by the Chorus in Agamemnon (vv. 160-83), to whom falls the task of communicating its severe discipline: Zeus leads mortals along the path of wisdom by decreeing the sovereign principle, “learning comes through suffering” (vv. 176-8). To those who have suffered, Dike grants understanding in return (vv. 250-1): one approaches sophrosynē, soundness of mind, by passing through suffering, pain, and disorientation. If, in light of this perspective, it is legitimate to attribute to πάθει μάθος a paideutic function, then it becomes inevitable to invoke, with all the implications that follow, individual action as well, since every pedagogical activity acquires meaning only if there is a mathētēs, a pupil, a disciple.
